In Thursday’s Guardian, Michael Cross looks at the issue of the company set up by the NHS’s Health and Social Care Information Centre, a special health authority set up last year to act as a single source of official NHS data:

Few repositories of public sector information contain more political dynamite than those in NHS data sets. This week it was NHS staff numbers; next week it could be surgeons’ death rates. Earlier this year, the official custodian of the NHS’s data raised eyebrows by announcing a special relationship with a commercial firm. At least one competing business has questioned whether a level playing field is possible under the new arrangement.

Here’s why:

In January, however, ministers announced that the Health and Social Care Information Centre had struck a deal with one firm in this market, Dr Foster Ltd. The two set up a private company, Dr Foster Intelligence, to sell information derived from NHS data. The information centre invested £12m in the joint venture.

Free NHS data is useful – and some is available: such as local health statistics and illnesses relating to your GP (see http://www.gpcontract.co.uk/, created by Dr Gavin Jamie, a Swindon GP (not MP – typo); read more at the Ideal Government blog. The question is, should a government organisation really be tying up with a private one in this way over data that ought to be available to all?

The following posts may be related...(the database guesses):
• Who owns patient records? The patient, the GP, the health service or its contractors? (10 July 2006; score: 27.75%)
• Who owns Scotland? Now without maps! (23 February 2007; score: 26.65%)
• In today's Guardian: how Inspire was watered down (22 May 2008; score: 14.51%)
• Could free data have helped the Rural Payments Agency? (19 April 2007; score: 12.95%)
• Get rid of Crown Copyright: Times article from September 2005 (25 May 2006; score: 12.67%)