Ed Parsons, once upon a time the chief technology officer of Ordnance Survey but now at Google, has blogged about the OS consultation, which he describes as a fairy tale:

The consultation understandably and in my mind quite rightly has remained focused on the specifics of making OS data free, and in the great tradition of Civil Service options papers offers a Goldilocks Choice; one too cold, one too hot and one option just about acceptable.

Option 1 appears to maintain the status-quo and I don’t see anyone outside the Romsey Road distortion field supporting it.

Option 2 is perhaps something that may be achievable in the long term with continued technological change and changing market requirements, however at the moment this would put Ordnance Survey in a position where it’s current operational processes are financially unsustainable.

So Option 3 represents the obvious compromise, some small scale data for free while allowing the cash cow of MasterMap to continue to fund a reduced but largely similar OS to the one we have today.

He also points to the elephants in the room – the issue of derived data (which is mentioned only once in the whole consultation, but which impinges crucially on so much geospatial work), and the lack of a national address register:

This is an issue bigger than Ordnance Survey, although OS has had its part to play in the current mess. This really does need strategic leadership from the centre.

Helpfully, he’s also collected a list of so-far published responses to the consultation, which we’ll shamelessly republish here. One large search engine’s response seems to be missing though… must be an oversight.

• New! (23/3) Placr, “a micro company with 4 employees based in London that is in the business of B2C and B2B value added information services in the mobile and geospatial domain.”
• New! (23/3) Intelligent Addressing “sets out its position for the changes required in order for OS to be left with a sustainable business for the future” (PDF)
• Local Government Association Group
• Advisory Panel on Public Sector Information
• Locus Association
• Tom Hughes
• Association for Geographic Information
• Free our Data Campaign that’s us!
• SystemeD.net
• Traveline
• OSGeo UK chapter and the Open Knowledge Foundation Network
• Andy Robinson
• Simon Brooke
• Stutchbury
• CycleStreets
• The Ramblers
• Christopher Roper
• The NHS Information Centre
• Leeds City Council
• Will Abson
• British Cartographic Society

Let us (and him) know if there are more public responses to the consultation. We’re expecting to hear something relevant on Monday, by the way. More closer to the time.

The following posts may be related...(the database guesses):
• "OS replies" article - updated to two columns (24 April 2006; score: 30.14%)
• Consultation update: still invisible, but asked in Parliament (18 December 2009; score: 27.12%)
• Anyone seen a consultation? (18 December 2009; score: 27.08%)
• Hurrah! Ordnance Survey consultation is live! (23 December 2009; score: 24.59%)
• Mark the date: July 17 at the RSA, London, for the Free Our Data debate (22 June 2006; score: 24.52%)