Ben Rooney writing in the Wall Street Journal, in an article titled “Public Ocean Data Made Available“:
An Estonian start-up is offering a single point of access to much of the world’s available oceanographic data.
Marinexplore, based in Tallinn, has pulled together a large number of public and commercial datasets, to provide over three petabytes (3 million gigabytes) of public ocean data.
“The tools and working processes for ocean exploration have changed little over the last 15 years,” said Rainer Sternfeld, founder and CEO of Marinexplore.
That’s a hell of an ambitious plan. It’s not just the cost of getting oceanographic data out there; it’s also the challenge of getting around the multitude of copyright entanglements in them. When the Free Our Data campaign was in full swing (or doing its jazz hands if you prefer), we prodded at the UK Hydrographic Office a few times – principally over tide data, since that’s hardly what you’d call “international” – but soon discovered that the people there are even more aware of the problems in disentangling quite who owns what. Making the UKHO data free might end up just meaning less data availability altogether.
“Most of the data comes from public sources”, the story says, which is telling in itself. There are lots of sources, but the problem often comes about in determining which is canonical – that is, which ones you really trust. One of the challenges for European countries has been making sure that simple things like sea levels are the same across borders. It’s a bit embarrassing if the data say it dips or rises by a few centimetres when you take one step along the shore from one country to another.
Which is why it’s no surprise to find that near the end of the story we learn that
Most of the data is from public data sets such as the US NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmosphere Administration) stations
. Yes, that’s the US taxpayers-pay-government-collects-and-gives-back model again.
This is course means that the datasets when it comes to locations such as the UK may be severely restricted both in use, detail and timeliness. We haven’t examined it yet – if anyone gets a change to look at Marinexplore’s data and assess it, please let us know.
(As a sidenote: isn’t it fascinating how the the US government and its citizens are perfectly happy to run a system where everyone contributes to the cost of collecting data about the oceans and then gets it back for free at the point of use – even if some won’t use it, for example because they live in landlocked states – but cannot countenance the idea of everyone contributing to the cost of healthcare which they then get back for free at the point of use? One is the peoples’ right to what their tax dollars are spent on; the other is, apparently, socialism. Beats us. We still like the US model for data payment/collection/use.)
- The following posts may be related...(the database guesses):
- Welcome, iPM listeners (27 September 2008; score: 20.59%)
- Late, but anyway: New Zealand makes (some) statistics free - but why? (27 July 2007; score: 20.54%)
- Inspire decision (22 November 2006; score: 16.79%)
- In today's Guardian: what the new OPSI rules mean (and don't mean) (6 April 2006; score: 16.14%)
- Trading Funds report: how trading fund prices don't account for wider economic benefits (12 March 2008; score: 15.83%)